ELECTING THE BEST QUALIFIED PERSON AS PRESIDENT
Christopher Ebbe, Ph.D. 8-16,9-20
ABSTRACT: Appropriate job criteria for the job of President of the United States are described, as well as methods of determining who to vote for that would help to elect the best qualified candidate.
KEY WORDS: politics, President, voting
Even though the U. S. President has limited power to unilaterally change things in the country, he or she is the symbolic leader of the country and has considerable influence over the future of citizens. Since the job of President is complicated and requires making good decisions about complex matters, as well as kissing babies and reassuring the citizens, it would seem valuable to consider just what skills and traits a President would have to have in order to do the best possible job as President. Unfortunately, there is almost no public discussion of this, even in election years. Voting decisions are made in a number of ways by citizens, including:
- voting for the party’s candidate rather than for an individual candidate, even when the party’s candidate may not actually represent the beliefs of the party (e.g., Donald Trump, 2016)
- voting for the candidate that someone else is going to vote for (a parent, a friend, someone one respects), without trying to consider who is best qualified
- voting for the candidate who agrees with one on a single issue that is important to one, such as abortion, unions, the environment, or war
- voting for the candidate who seems most aggressive (and therefore supposedly best for defending the country or waging war)
- voting for the candidate who is best looking
- voting for the candidate who comes from one’s own part of the country
- voting for the candidate with the greatest name recognition, even though that recognition may not be entirely positive
- flipping a coin
- voting for the candidate who promises the most (even though these promises by presidential candidates are almost never fulfilled, since the President does not have the power to actually make these thing happen but must have agreement from Congress and/or the courts)
- voting for the candidate who seems most like oneself
- voting for the person whose name appears at the top of the ballot
- voting for the candidate whose campaign has done the most negative advertising (or, alternatively, voting for the candidate whose campaign has done the least amount of negative advertising)
- voting for the candidate that one “likes” best
- voting for the candidate with whom one would most like to share a meal or a beer
- considering a range of issues that are important to the country and matching up those issues with the candidates’ positions
- carefully evaluating the personal traits and abilities of candidates to do the job of President well
Only the last two of these consciously aim at electing the best qualified candidate, so it is little wonder that Presidents who are elected vary a great deal in fitness for office! For some voters, the use of intuition, based on various social cues, may help them rule out some unqualified candidates, but careful attention to actual job functions and associated skills would identify the most qualified candidate even better.
JOB TASKS
The President engages in the following activities (if he/she is to be maximally effective):
- after carefully considering various alternatives, chooses what seems to be the best solution to a problem or the best policy to follow (with regard to problems and issues that are usually quite complex and require research, lengthy reading, and gathering opinions from “experts” and advisors)
- proposes the above solutions/policies to the public and to Congress, with supportive reasons and data
- hires and appoints a multitude of government officials and administrative advisers
- considers all citizens and their needs, not just those he/she likes or identifies with, and seeks solutions that are in an overall sense best for the country
- organizes support for his/her positions among legislators and the public
- compromises on solutions/policies when doing so is demanded by the exigency of the situation and the impact on the public
- acts as commander-in-chief of the country’s armed forces; inspires the troops; makes military decisions with the advice of generals; seeks Congressional approval or support for what he/she views as needed military actions
- determines foreign policy according to his/her goals for the country and for the world, consistent with the general values of the country
- interacts with leaders of foreign nations and groups in order to build relationships and obtain cooperation
- informs citizens about problems, solutions, and policies
- inspires citizens to be “good citizens” and participate in community and government
- lives by values that inspire citizens (setting an ethical example and modeling adaptive ways of relating to other citizens)
- engages in symbolic actions that garner support from citizens and engender a feeling of togetherness on the part of all citizens (christening submarines, kissing babies, opening shopping centers, hosting Easter egg rolls, inspecting sites of disasters, etc.)
The most qualified President is the one who can do the greatest number of these things well, with legislative, military, and foreign policy functions weighted more heavily.
QUALIFICATIONS
Here are comments and explication regarding each Presidential job task.
- after carefully considering various alternatives, chooses what seems to be the best solution to a problem or the best policy to follow (with regard to problems and issues that are usually quite complex and require research, lengthy reading, and gathering opinions from “experts” and advisors)
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
The President must decide between various possible solutions to serious and complicated problems (how to engender growth in the economy, what foreign alliances to seek, how to guarantee religious liberty, how to balance economic growth with saving the environment, etc.), so the President should have the ability to understand the underlying issues as well as the details of both the problem and the possible solutions, plus having the ability to predict the outcomes of the various possible solutions. This requires high intelligence, but brainpower alone is not sufficient. The President must have practical intelligence, have a keen understanding of people, and have good judgment in general (choosing well among options, based on good information). The President has many advisers who may provide some of this information and suggest various options, but in the end the President must choose wisely.
Voters could judge these abilities from the candidate’s verbal statements or the candidate’s written statements, but our electoral system encourages simplistic statements for or against issues and actions, and candidates hardly ever send out written statements that go any deeper than this, even if they write them. (This philosophy is based on the belief that it’s more effective to get the voter to identify with you than to agree with you, so issuing detailed statements about what one would do as President would have more likelihood of losing voters who might disagree with some part of the statements than would just keeping it simple (which doesn’t tell the voters what one will actually do when in office).)
In considering various solutions to problems, the President should bear in mind the welfare of all citizens, whether or not they voted for him or her, and should take seriously their various concepts of how they would like country to be. The President must care for (all) citizens and truly want what is best for them. This caring for citizens’ welfare must be stronger than his or her desire to be re-elected, if the President is to have maximum positive impact on the country.
- proposes the above solutions/policies to the public and to Congress, with supportive reasons and data
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
Good communications skills–both speaking and writing–are important, as well as the ability to express one’s vision for bettering the country and to tie this vision clearly to current proposals. For long-term effectiveness, honesty is particularly important here—to tell the whole truth (pros and cons) about the impact of changes proposed and not just “sell” an idea.
- hires and appoints a multitude of government officials and administrative advisers
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
First and foremost, the President can influence the workings of government in general by hiring and appointing persons of the highest competence, rather than rewarding campaign contributors and other supporters with government jobs. These persons should be focused on doing their jobs as best they can, rather than being chosen for their loyalty to the President and their willingness to do the job exactly as the President requests even when it is not in the public interest. (Of course, it would be unwise for the President to hire or appoint persons who are antagonistic to the President or his agendas.) Persons who are able and willing to present the President with facts and considered opinions that may go against the President’s initial opinions and positions will be useful. The primary job skill for the President in this area is the good judgment to recognize ability and attitudes that will support the process goals just described.
- considers all citizens and their needs, not just those he/she likes or identifies with, and seeks solutions that are in an overall sense best for the country
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
If a President is to make the best possible judgments, he or she must care enough about the issues and the citizens to expend the energy needed to gather the necessary information and make those judgments with care. So many people run for office for the primary purpose of gaining personal power and social status that it takes careful scrutiny and social acumen to identify those who want to have an important office in order to do good for the country and can therefore use all of their energies in carrying out the various tasks of the office (rather than doing things that are largely for their own benefit). Wanting to gain office in order to do what one believes is right morally is not the same thing as wanting to do what is best for the country, either, and doing what is best for the country is also sometimes different from what one would personally want.
A President must be able to see all sides of the arguments in order to judge them fairly and without prejudice, and she must be respectful and thoughtful about all opinions.
In some unusual circumstances a President, in doing what is best for the country, will weaken her own party’s chances in the next elections. Presidents must walk a tightrope to both honor the democratic process, which looks for consensus and needed compromise, and do what she knows will be best for the whole country.
If a President is the President for all of the people and not just for her party’s supporters, then it would be consistent with that position to appoint and hire people in government for their ability to do the job and contribute rather than giving jobs and positions to campaign supporters.
- organizes support for his/her positions among legislators and the public
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
The President does this by making convincing and honest arguments, not by arm-twisting, vote-buying, or vote-trading. These latter methods always demonstrate to some citizens that one cannot be trusted to act in their best interest, which in the long run will harm one’s effectiveness more than being honest.
- compromises on solutions/policies when doing so is demanded by the exigency of the situation and the impact on the public
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
As more and more people have become identified with positions on specific issues (e.g., abortion, global warming) and as more and more people have found others who agree with them on the internet, more and more people believe that their own position is the only “right” or reasonable position and see no reason why the system should not adopt it. Thus, the art of political compromise has gone into disrepute, and candidates promise to “fight for” various things for you, rather than to do what is best for the country. With the Constitution’s division of powers and system of checks and balances, the President cannot simply make things happen and cannot tell legislators how to vote, so trying to find the best possible compromise is the only way to get very much done. To identify effective Presidents, voters can look for willingness in candidates to find solutions, usually requiring compromises, as opposed to rigid promises to “fight” and never surrender.
This puts voters in a philosophically uncomfortable position, since we want them to be “involved” and to care about the issues, but we know that many of them will not get their own way on any given issue. In order for our democratic system to work, voters must choose candidates who are similar in general to their own positions and have similar values and beliefs, while knowing at the same time that the final outcomes will probably be compromises (the alternative being total lack of action). Citizens must believe that the net effect of these various compromises will be in their best interest in the long term.
This question of who is benefited by specific governmental policies relates also to the tendency in the U.S. to always strive to benefit oneself even if others are hurt in the process. This is consistent with the attitudes of our immigrant ancestors, who came here to better themselves and had to be quite assertive to do so. People still will (usually) help others in an emergency, but most of the time they seek their own benefit and expect others to do the same, thus putting various groups of citizens in constant conflict with some other group. Shifting the attitudes of all citizens toward taking into account the impact of policy decisions on all citizens would lead to more good feeling among citizens and toward the government.
- acts as commander-in-chief of the country’s armed forces; inspires the troops; makes military decisions with the advice of generals; seeks Congressional approval or support for what he/she views as needed military actions
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
This function involves the same data-gathering, analytic, judgment, and communication skills that any policy decision requires. The President must preserve some distance between herself and the nation’s military, in order not to imply to the public that the military should support her personally. Presidents who like power should be especially watchful to not to engage the country in military actions just so they can feel powerful.
- determines foreign policy according to his/her goals for the country and for the world, consistent with the general values of the country
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
In this function the President must carefully consider long-term consequences of current policies. There is first a fundamental decision to be made between seeking cooperative relationships and trying to get our way through dominating. The U.S. has the power currently to force some things on other countries, but in the long run the dislike and hatred engendered by force may result in large costs to the U.S. Taking resources cheaply from another country and supporting an autocratic leader of another country ostensibly for the sake of current stability are both examples of policies that may have huge costs later on in terms of revolutions and expropriations.
Secondly, there is a decision to be made about balancing the interests of this country with those of other countries. It is important that all agreements to cooperate be fair to both parties, and it will lead to greater cooperation in the future if the U.S. does not try to “get the best deal possible” if such a deal will benefit the leaders and the rich of the other country but also be to the disadvantage of ordinary citizens. (Countries are currently having to face up to the anger of ordinary citizens about job losses due to globalization, even though globalization increases the overall wealth of all countries, because negotiators looked only at the immediate and overall wealth results and not at the steep costs to some of their citizens.) The long-term interests of the U.S. will be maximized if in our foreign policy and actions we ensure that the whole citizenry of other countries will gain a positive impression of the U.S.
- interacts with leaders of foreign nations and groups in order to build relationships and obtain cooperation
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
The skills needed for positive and productive relationships with foreign leaders are in general the same as those needed for any good relationships–honesty, responsibility, forthrightness, empathy, concern for others, and communication skills. Efforts to bully, dominate, or take advantage of those leaders and their countries will harm long-term outcomes for the U.S.
- informs citizens about problems, solutions, and policies
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
The President can enhance the governance process by clearly communicating to the citizens current issues, proposals, and legislation, which allows the citizens to feel that they are a part of the process and are being consulted about their wishes. To do this, a President must have good communication skills and must understand the needs of the citizens. President Reagan was very good at making these communications, because his manner was soothing and inspired confidence.
- inspires citizens to be “good citizens” and participate in community and government
Relevant Skills and abilities:
It is interesting that few Presidents focus on inspiring citizens, perhaps because they are already inevitably receiving thousands of disparate communications from citizens about what those citizens want, and to inspire even more communications would make the job near impossible!
- lives by values that inspire citizens (setting an ethical example and modeling adaptive ways of relating to other citizens)
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
Since persons who are motivated to go through the arduous process of becoming President are often motivated by desires for power and fame, they are not usually the kind of person to inspire others through their own goodness and appropriateness (even though they may make some “lip service” efforts toward this). A person who was a good President and a great person could do this well.
A person who is committed to honesty and to finding the truth will make a better President than one who is not (who is willing to “bend the truth” or tell white lies in order to gain personal advantage or get people to go along with him or her). The alternative is electing someone who is willing to lie to us, and we wouldn’t admit that we wanted that, even though many citizens prefer comfortable lies to the truth! Telling the truth requires telling the truth even when it is embarrassing to one and when it makes citizens mad, which are good tests of how committed one is to being truthful. Once again, we must pay attention to what candidates say and how they say it in order to see how much a candidate cares about the truth. Telling the truth is especially important during campaigns, for preserving the public’s hopefulness and trust, rather than exaggerating and bending the truth to make oneself look better or one’s opponent to look worse.
A person who is strongly committed to being responsible will make a better President than one who is not (who is willing to let things slide or who is happy to shift responsibility to others for things that he or she has done). Being responsible requires that one “take care of business” no matter how demanding it is to do so. A major aspect of responsibility for Presidents is not to spend more than the government can afford without borrowing, no matter who might benefit from the government thus going into debt (since most of those who will have to pay for that borrowing are future and not current Americans).
A person who is strongly committed to fairness will make a better President than one who wants to first do the most he can for certain people (family, party, race, etc.), since fairness ensures that all citizens benefit at least somewhat equally, while favoring certain people ensures that some will benefit more than others.
A person who is trustworthy will make a better President than one who is not, if trustworthy is understood to mean “predictably and reliably doing the right thing.” (Trusting someone to do what is in your best interest or to do what you agree with are different and are matters more of expectation than trust.)
A responsible campaign would publish position papers on all important issues and problems, even though it could get more votes by remaining vague and not making commitments.
A person with integrity will make a better President than one who does not have integrity (who is inconsistent within himself and inconsistent in his presentation of self to others). The great temptation for politicians is to be what each person they interact with wants them to be, in order to avoid unpleasantness or keep that person loyal, but being a chameleon is inevitably looked down on by citizens.
A campaign with integrity would make clear to donors and lobbyists that they will receive no greater attention than would citizens who have not donated.
- engages in symbolic actions that garner support from citizens and engender a feeling of togetherness on the part of all citizens (christening submarines, kissing babies, opening shopping centers, hosting Easter egg rolls, inspecting sites of disasters, etc.)
Relevant Skills and Abilities:
The President serves as an emotional and values leader for the country in the eyes of many, despite the fact that voters who need no emotional or values leader would probably be better at electing the most qualified President. Since many voters do want to line up their emotions and values with those of a leader, it is important that the President live and act in ways that are consistent with the overall values of the country and that are above reproach.
USING THIS INFORMATION
You can use this conception of how to select the most qualified President, if you choose to. First of all, you might consider whether you actually want to elect the most qualified candidate, rather than doing so on some other basis. If you would prefer to vote for someone on some other basis, clarify in your mind what that basis is (the candidate’s stand on an issue that is particularly important to you, someone from your home state, etc.).
In general, it is best to ignore the information and actions that candidates use to try to get your vote, because they are unfortunately almost all manipulative and scripted to influence you rather than to let you know who the candidates really are. You must pay attention instead to how they act and how they say things for clues to how they would behave as President. For the long term, you could help our process by requesting detailed statements from candidates in every election about policies and proposed actions on a full list of currently relevant issues (see below). Tell your friends about the concept of electing the person who can best do the job according to criteria that most people can agree on (and show them the form below). Tell your party officials that you want to see these criteria illustrated by a candidate’s actions and statements. Candidates saying simply “trust me” is simply too dangerous for electing a President. The following pages have a “Scorecard” for rating and comparing candidates, using the skills, abilities, strengths, and qualifications elaborated above. You will not know some of the more specific items for every candidate, but rating what you do know and realizing what you don’t know will help you to decide what more you want to find out and then which candidate you will vote for.
A SCORECARD FOR ELECTING A PRESIDENT
(You can simply checkmark that the qualification is present, or you can use a simple rating scale (1, 2, or 3) to help separate candidates.)
candidates
A B C
___ ___ ___ has the physical ability to persevere through an elected term
___ ___ ___ has ability to study and understand complex issues and
systems
___ ___ ___ willing to learn from others and use others’ knowledge to solve
problems
___ ___ ___ has ability to predict outcomes of various courses of action
___ ___ ___ uses advisers who are competent and not just those who agree
with him/her
___ ___ ___ can compromise on solutions/policies when doing so is
demanded by the exigency of the situation and the impact on
the public (rather than insisting on “winning”)
___ ___ ___ has the emotional strength to do the right thing rather than, in
some cases, do what others want or would approve of
___ ___ ___ has the emotional strength to do what is best for the country
even if it would act against his/her re-election
___ ___ ___ has the emotional strength to resist tax cuts if they would lead
to increasing the national debt
___ ___ ___ has the emotional strength to nominate judges for their judicial
ability and fairness rather than for being liberal of conservative
___ ___ ___ has worthwhile ideas about reducing the influence of money
(campaign contributions, advertising) on elections
___ ___ ___ will support getting legislation that is clear and specific enough
to not need “interpretation” by the Supreme Court
___ ___ ___ carefully considers long-term consequences of all actions, not
just short-term benefits
___ ___ ___ can withstand urges to spend and borrow excessively when to
do so would create worse future problems for the country (even
when people are in need)
___ ___ ___ has clear position on government borrowing and national debt,
with an announced plan for repayment (rather than a vague
expectation that the economy will grow or that there will be
more in tax revenues than Congress can spend!)
___ ___ ___ can see both (all) sides of every issue and addresses them in
announcing his/her decisions
___ ___ ___ accepts that there is value in the considered view of every
citizen
___ ___ ___ is respectful of all, even when disagreeing
___ ___ ___ has a keen understanding of people and their needs and
feelings
___ ___ ___ has good judgment
___ ___ ___ has strong concern about the welfare of all citizens
___ ___ ___ will treat all citizens equally, rather than favor certain groups
or favor those who have supported him/her
___ ___ ___ seeks office to serve and not primarily for fame or power
___ ___ ___ has strong speaking and writing skills
___ ___ ___ communicates effectively a vision for a better country and a
better life
___ ___ ___ makes effort to inform citizens of intentions, particularly
during decision-making processes
___ ___ ___ is honest and candid; tells the truth rather than hiding behind
words, especially when the truth is personally embarrassing or
will make some citizens mad
___ ___ ___ is responsible; takes care of business, no matter how difficult;
does not blame or hide behind others to cover his mistakes
___ ___ ___ is trustworthy (can be trusted to reliably do the right thing)
___ ___ ___ is forthright enough to respond honestly to voters and co-
workers, rather than hiding intentions and views
___ ___ ___ has integrity (is consistent, takes responsibility, and acts
consistently with her values)
___ ___ ___ sets an appropriate and moral example for citizens
___ ___ ___ is committed to fair treatment of all and to not favoring those
who are close or who support him; does not favor campaign
contributors or lobbyists over others
___ ___ ___ tells citizens the negative effects of his/her positions, as well as
the positive
___ ___ ___ does not promise things that he/she could never deliver
___ ___ ___ will “bring the nation together” by seeking what is best for all
rather than favoring only some groups of citizens
___ ___ ___ has reasonable position supporting getting all citizens to vote
(voter suppression? voter ID laws? non-partisan defining of
voting precincts? protecting vote counts from hacking?
improving accuracy of voter rolls?)
___ ___ ___ will act to reduce the effects of money on elections (limiting
campaign contributions? reducing campaign period?)
___ ___ ___ respects and adheres to the Constitution’s separation of powers
between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of
government, rather than belittling or trying to bypass the
legislature or courts
___ ___ ___ will nominate Supreme Court judges based on legal abilities
without regard for their political views (or will seek centrist
candidates)
___ ___ ___ seeks cooperation among nations rather than threatening and
bullying them
___ ___ ___ has a vision of the sort of world order that will benefit other
nations as well as the U.S.
___ ___ ___ will work with other countries to solve global problems (climate
change, mutual defense, trade, human rights, nuclear threat)
___ ___ ___ will adhere to treaties and alliances as promised
___ ___ ___ has a fundamentally moral concept of appropriate government
action and foreign policy
___ ___ ___ will keep the military up to date and effective
___ ___ ___ will seek a fair solution to the Israeli-Palestinian problem
___ ___ ___ can interact comfortably and effectively with those who are
different from him/her
___ ___ ___ can speak inspiringly to citizens, calling them to be the best
they can be
___ ___ ___ can cheerfully serve as a symbol of the country and of the
government in formal and informal actions that give a good
impression of the country and the citizens
___ ___ ___ will seek to reduce the wealth disparity in our country, by
reasonable means
___ ___ ___ will act to help all wage earners to earn enough to live on and
have a “decent” life
___ ___ ___ will act to help workers displaced by globalization to find
employment (support from former employer and government?
retraining? paying moving costs to relocate for jobs?)
___ ___ ___ will protect our free speech traditions rather than suppressing
speech that upsets some citizens
___ ___ ___ will encourage all, including candidates, politicians, and
internet contributors, to adhere to the truth, rather than using
speech for self-gain
___ ___ ___ has a cogent plan to assist homeless persons to re-enter the
work force
___ ___ ___ has a cogent and prudent plan to prepare the country for
climate change
___ ___ ___ will seek reasonable reform of immigration laws
___ ___ ___ has a cogent and fair plan to provide all citizens with access to a
reasonable amount of healthcare
___ ___ ___ will act to reduce gun violence in the country (licensing of
owners? background checks for all purchasers?)
___ ___ ___ will act to better define religious freedom (public expression?
burden on other citizens? opting out of anything that one
doesn’t agree with?)
essays\presidentialchoice Christopher Ebbe, Ph.D. 9-2016